The Standard Model treats the electron as a dimensionless point. But because this wave function spinor DOES turn, even slowly, it contributes to the angular momentum of the atom the electron is bound in. It only turns half as fast as a real vector would! It was given the name 'spinor' to memorialize this. Then it turns out that this 'vector' doesn't behave like a vector when you change coordinates (for example by rotating through an angle). Quantum spin is an effect on the wave function of the particle instead of being described by a single complex number, it becomes what looks at first like a vector of complex numbers. Your problem is that electron spin is quantum, not classical, and electrons do not spin in the fashion of classical objects like balls. This type of behavior only resembles something similar to a black hole in the quantum scale. If this were the case, each electron would be composed of an infinate ammount of energy, and would curve space-time to the point where it's discontinuous at the electron's center. If electrons were points, then the smallest distance between them approaches zero, not 2Re. That is the maximum ammount of thier influence on space-time. The limit is the distance between the centers of the two kissing electrons, ie. All this implies that (assuming electrons can overcome the coulumb force between them) they can touch each other, and therefore the ammount of space-time curvature has a limit.

This means that it's not a point, but that it has a surface (although the electron's radius hasn't been determined). Quantum spin assumes the electron takes up physical space otherwise it wouldn't be able to spin. What does everybody else thinks? (Note: in the past we have discussed wormholes as a possibility for teleportation, but I am interested in what people have to say about the transporter.) Still, it's rather chancy, but I would think that the individual who first underwent this form of teleportation has ceased to exist and replaced with a replica, who would have all your memories and experiences. The problem is there no way to actually account for the first person point-of-view, or know if the person would survive the procedure, unless you or I decide to undergo it. However, you could compensate by disintegrating some rocks and adding in that energy too. Another problem is that the second law of thermodynamics tells us that in any conversion of matter, some energy is inevitably lost. Once the energy arrives at the appointed destination, the process is reversed.The problem is when you convert matter into energy, you're basically creating a huge explosion, equilvalent to a nuclear missile. The transporter works by disassembling crew members at the atomic level and converting them into energy. To find out why let's examine how the transporter operates. From a creative point-of-view, it served as an excellent plot device, however, scientifically it will never work. Originally, Roddenberry set out to have his characters on a shuttlecraft, but was unable to afford the necessary budget to do so, hence, the transpoter was born. He needed his characters to get from the ship to the planet within a short period of time. The concept was created by the late-Gene Roddenberry. The transporter in Star Trek is one of the most fascinating theoretical technologies on board the starship Enterprise.

Star trek transporter